Problems of legislation in the field of construction public procurement

Construction is the most priority direction for state customers. As for the legislation in force for the placement and receipt of orders in such an area as construction public procurement, it is necessary to state the fact that it is quite tough. Federal customers are required to conduct an open auction in electronic form to accommodate orders. This rule is really, starting with 01.07.2010, there are also exceptions to the placement of orders only through an open competition. Violations threaten the issuance of an order on the cancellation of trading and administrative liability of guilty officials. As for regional, as well as municipal customers, starting from January 1, 2011, they can place orders for goods, work and services from the list, which was approved by the Government of the Russian Federation at number 236-r of 27.02.2008, to work on capital repair and construction or reconstruction in the form of electronic auctions. These legislative norms often cannot solve the complex issues that arise during their implementation. For example, questions often arise on how to take into account the necessary experience of the participant’s work. An important question is also the need to provide the SRO to allow. It is necessary to know that the allowance of the SRO is required if the object is “capital” and its construction requires permission. In addition, the orders of the Ministry of Regional Development of the Russian Federation define the work for which the provision of admission to the SRO does not need. There is also a question of a change of no more than 10%, the contract price and the volume of work with an increase in the customer’s need for work. For this case, a legislative norm is needed, which would allow additional agreements in the amount of these 10%. In this case, it still remains incomprehensible how the customer and supplier will establish the cost of these initially unaccounted work. The fact is that this can provoke both possible abuse of the customer and negative