The ideological guideline of supporters of suburban construction is the creation of the employment and a comprehensive environment that win in competition with the city. And it is the environment, and not just low -rise houses and villages.
Urbanophiles are usually chuckle at such an attack, they say, it is impossible to replace the city, it has no competitors, and he continues to grow, belittling all forms for extracurricular life. Most of modern urbanophobes only add water to the Urbanophile Mill, because the “Exodus in the Forests” promotes. That is, they promote the abandonment of urban benefits in return for pristine nature and natural economy. Not much better in this regard, and developers of low -rise villages that build fenced off the world, local country’s autonomy from a small number of houses having primitive infrastructure.
And consumer culture is evolving as opposed to this. More recently, the demand for the “candy wrappers” has already been ready for a turn for savings and practicality, which shows survival by blessings, and also sets the prerequisites for the “simplification of life”. In the low -rise sector, this is manifested through the conscious restriction of the area of land and plots of houses and in the rejection of price excesses, in exchange for ergonomic and efficiency. But this also does not mean at all a refusal to conquered by civilization of the basic sets of functional improvements for the human body, life and business. This turn to practicality brings hope for people’s readiness to limit themselves from an unbridled race for shopping and city entertainment. That in America and Europe is already the norm.
